The Brexit Effect: How Global Mobility is Being Impacted in Europe and Beyond

It all boils down to the fact that free trade agreements specifically include concessions for mobility. Combined with reduced taxes and government programs to encourage foreign investments, this opened the door for professionals to ply their trade in different countries successfully. Another step later down this pipeline is streamlining visas and entry requirements—all promoting the movement of skilled professionals across borders.

The political machinations that led to the UK deciding to part ways with the EU, Brexit, have been discussed far and wide, and I will not be going over them. If you want to brush up on it, the NY Times and BBC have good summaries here and here, respectively. Relevant to this discussion is that the British people have been promised that Brexit would end the EU’s famed free movement, that is, the right of mainland European people to live and work in Britain. This is a form of protectionism, the term mentioned earlier.

Protectionism refers to the economic curtailing of imports through tariffs, quotas, and other governmental policies. Cutting down on importing foreign workers falls under it, directly opposing the free movement that made the EU a unique success story in world history.

Common sense identifies this as a detrimental idea, not only to GM professionals but also to long-term economic stability and growth, yet so few speak up against it—the very fact that Brexit is happening is evidence of that fact. Why is that so?

A significant reason for that is the fear-mongering stoked by politicians, particularly about how immigration and immigrants “steal” the jobs of the locals. This belief is firm among the working class, which rallies behind all attempts to close down free movement. Unfortunately, this spread of fear works on everyone, at various levels, especially in these times of economic hardship, it is easy to buy into the idea that immigrants are responsible for the worsening economy or the lack of jobs. No one likes to step out of their comfort zone, especially to speak up about uncomfortable topics.

The result? While Brexit has been lingering for years, the political uncertainty it has led to is already creating ripples across the GM community. Companies will face increasingly challenging situations when seeking to move the talent they want into the most needed location.

Many companies are moving out of or planning to leave the UK, taking hundreds of thousands of jobs from locals. This is clearly not the best-case scenario.

This unpredictability is not limited merely to the immigration aspects of Global Mobility, as taxation and exchange of information would become increasingly sophisticated, making it more difficult for companies and authorities to work out and resolve governance and tax payment issues. A potential problem from this unpredictability is not knowing how the UK will treat its laws and legislation dealing with worker rights, taxation, and other aspects based on relevant sections of EU law. That is something troubling corporations and experts in finances, taxation, and mobility alike.

Another factor determining why we haven’t been more outspoken about the ramifications of politics on our field is the overabundance of fake news. When someone’s statement is countered with aggressively presented “facts”, the people believing in those “facts” can influence others and draw out our voice of reason.

Does anyone remember the infamous “Brexit Bus”? Despite being proven to be a falsehood, that “fact” is considered one of the major reasons Leave won the Brexit referendum. Despite people speaking up about the falsehood of that “fact”, the Brexit Bus still swayed millions with its lie. How does one make themselves heard in such a scenario?

Brexit and EU are not the only places where this tidal wave of fear-based politics and misinformation have had an impact on Global Mobility. In March 2018, Australia ended one of its most popular work visas for global professionals with claims that the visa was taking jobs away from Australians, replacing it with one that was a lot more stricter on professionals and companies alike. The USA’s stance towards the mobility of foreigners is also of note, targeting millions of Muslims from around the world, and about the same number from south of their border through the implementation of various “travel bans”. These policies have been crucial in disrupting nearly all companies that source their talent globally.

As these roadblocks mount, we are faced with a unique, ever-growing challenge of navigating political opposition to its core tenant and unpredictable laws that can spring up at any moment. Given this uncertainty, what we can do at this turbulent time is developing a series of rapid response protocols/procedures that allow us to stay on top of these shifts while carving out a longer-term plan for navigating these changing political waters.

We are currently at the crossroads of extinction or expansion of our profession. As I’ve been working on expanding our skillset and mindset over the last few years, I hope we step up our game. If we want to continue adding value as a function, we need to show through our actions that we are finding solutions to all those ever-more complex issues. I usually hold back my political opinion here and on social media for fear of attracting trolls and haters. Still, I’m committed to supporting “outsiders” and working with a more diverse team.

We must think big and start with baby steps in our front yard. For example, I will work with a mentee from Zambia. My clients come from around the world, but we can still do more to encourage global competency development and break down the barriers to Global Mobility. We can set examples and work on positive changes in our realm of influence, whether we are nomads, expats, expat entrepreneurs, scientists, rainbow talent or Global Mobility Professionals.